What Is a Static Site Today?
There are numerous approaches to developing a web application that is performant. Going the static site way is just one of them. Pause here. What do we/I mean when we/I say static sites?
Nowadays, in the Jamstack world, and in web development in general, it’s really common to hear the notion of Static Sites. This idea is not new, Static Sites have been around for decades, but recently we are talking more and more about them because most common frontend frameworks and hosting companies are providing that capability: to be static.
But in a world where everything is dynamic, why would you need a Static Site (or Static Website)? We are going to dive deep into the different abstractions.
First, we need to establish clear definitions:
- Dynamic, by the opposition, means that a page can change on each reload (or at least part of it), and it is generated on the fly.
It is important to mention that interactions on a page (animations, buttons, and actions) are not putting the Site into the Dynamic category. Static versus Dynamic is a conceptualization from the server-side point of view.
And, on a personal note that might be useful, I want to come back to the word: Site (or Website). I always struggle to explain our industry to friends and family because they think I am building Sites that, for them, relate to something that is done via a tool like Microsoft Word or Google Docs, etc. (remember Microsoft Frontpage and early Adobe Dreamweaver?) or even Google Sites.
That’s why I more often use the term Web Application because we are doing more than rendering pages. A Web Application is the hypernym of Site/Website, the superclass for the nerdiest of us. So, Web Applications include simple sites and more complex applications that run on the Internet.
It’s good to remember that at the beginning of the Web, everything was static HTML pages, and to make more Dynamic applications, people innovated and produced languages to render web pages that are not really Static. CGI, Perl, and PHP were the most popular solutions at the beginning.
Those languages were used to generate (on the fly) HTML pages, making them dynamic, those computations being done on the server side, where other resources were available, like a database, for example.
And for a while, that was the way to go. You would pick the framework and the stack that you’d like to build your application. (LAMP, Linux, Apache, MySQL PHP might ring a bell to some of you).
For example, imagine you are building a web application, a Blog. On a simple blog, you probably have four templates of pages:
- The Home page lists all recent Blog Posts.
- Highly dynamic, it will change each time a new blog post is published.
- The Category page lists all the Blog Posts for a specific category.
- Dynamic, it will change each time a new blog post is published in that category.
- A blog post page to render the blog post's content and receive comments.
- Almost static if we exclude the comments.
- A contact page with a form.
- Always the same: immutable.
To run your blog, your web application needs to save the content (and media) of your blog post in storage (most likely a database), and it will use processing and computation power to render (on the fly) your blog post.
Ex: https://www.crystallize.com/blog/what-is-static-site - The web server receives the request from the browser. - It extracts the URI /blog/hello-world, looks in the database, and fetches the content related to `/hello-world`. - Compute and merge the content data with the template. - Return the fully generated page to the browser. (HTML/CSS/JS).
Regardless of whether you have one blog post or 10 million, the process is always the same, and it is repeated.
We call that a dynamic web application; in more technical terms, it’s called SSR for Server Side Rendering. Like everything, there are benefits and disadvantages, as we explained in our practical guide to web rendering.
What led (and leads) people to look to other solutions is performance. Indeed generating the page on the fly makes it always up-to-date because data is coming right from the database (fresh), but the downside is that every single time, you compute the same thing over and over. And you will consume a lot of computation power, and you might not succeed because your architecture might not scale.
So what if you would generate the blog post, HTML/CSS/JS once, and reuse the result?
Enter the Static philosophy.
They refer to applications that are pre-generated (or built) one time, deployed, and served. Once the application is built, there is no more computation and no need for databases or server-side processing. It could be seen as a form of compilation that results in HTML, CSS, JS, and media files deployed (stored) onto the server(s).
That’s a huge performance benefit right there.
Back in the day, we would usually build a dynamic application that we would consume to generate static files out of it, but doing that was not trivial.
If I take the same Blog example mentioned above, we would need a new step, the build step.
We would not deploy the dynamic application; instead, we would pre-generate all the possible pages in advance. The build would be the only place that would require access to the database.
Once all the pages would be generated, they would be deployed, allowing:
Ex: https://www.crystallize.com/blog/what-is-static-site - The web server receives the request from the browser. - It returns the fully pre-generated page to the browser. (HTML/CSS/JS).
No computation, no processing, back to the old times. Blazing fast, secure, and easily scalable.
That is what we call a static web application. In more technical terms, it’s called SSG, which stands for Static Site Generation (look at the web rendering post). Like everything, there are benefits and disadvantages to the SSG approach as well.
The main problem with Static Generation is that now if you change a part of the text in your blog post, your database will be updated, but the static pages won’t, i.e., the pages are stale in opposition to being fresh.
This means you need to run the build step (and deploy the result), which pre-supposes that you can trigger that automatically because you probably don’t want to bug your system administrator every time you change a typo.
And now we are looping between Static willing to be dynamic and Dynamic willing to be Static.
Another approach is to have a “kind of” middleware called Reverse Proxy. Those components are installed between the servers and the browsers, and they would save the static version of a dynamically server-side rendered page, to serve it statically thereafter.
That’s called HTTP Caching, and a CDN, Content Delivery Network, does that on the edge of the world. Those reverse proxy servers usually have a built-in mechanism to purge entries from their storage, so you can invalidate one page instead of rebuilding everything.
It's a very powerful approach, but it requires a very good comprehension of the web of HTTP and can become complex for small projects. You probably should read mine and Bård's post Event-Driven HTTP Caching for eCommerce for more information on HTTP Caching.
What changed in recent years is the toolings that have evangelized the SSG. From the development framework to the hosting of it with Serverless in the middle to make it cheap.
The framework is made to generate static pages in opposition to rendering pages on the fly (SSR) to make them static eventually.
It’s SSG first, and when you need dynamic things, then the framework and the hosting would allow that in a very streamlined way.
Following the framework + hosting conventions, you would have part of your code that can be executed in serverless function when it has to be dynamic (when you need computation server side).
With NextJS, for example, you can decide per page (or type of page) if you want SSG or SSR. Even better, if you want to build an API with the frontend framework, you can do that as well. Behind the scenes, when hosted, they would trigger the serverless function that needs to run to execute (process) the code server side.
But they don’t stop here. On the hosting part, they also provide all the automation needed to rebuild. They provide webhooks to trigger actions like a rebuild:
- You change a typo in your blog post.
- Your CMS calls the webhook.
- The application is rebuilt and redeployed.
All the processes are streamlined now and are way more trivial than they were years ago.
Another thing that enables that, part of the Jamstack ideology, is that hosting companies are CDNs on steroids. You cannot add your database there. Instead, you rely on other services that provide APIs for it.
By the way, this is what we do at Crystallize. We take care of the backend for eCommerce and product storytelling features, exposing blazing-fast API for you to use.
The contact page is a very good candidate for a Static page because it won’t change often. But how do you save the submission, send an email, or push the submission data to your Customer Relationship Management (CRM) solution?
One way to do this is with a serverless function handled by Next.js API Route, Gatsby Functions, or even Netlify functions. Netlify took it a bit further. Everything is static when they host your static application. As a fantastic protocol, HTTP allows them to easily detect when you fetch a page (GET) or send submissions (POST). As a result, they catch the submission server-side for you, and all you have to do is build the HTML for the form.
To me, that’s a perfect example of how Static and Dynamic are mixed together.
Well, to me, it does not really exist because even the simplest web application has content, and that content needs to be updated at some point. For me, a Static Site is a way of putting your web application in one of two categories:
- SSG with dynamic stuff injected via Serverless or framework/hosting capabilities.
- SSR with static stuff in the architecture like CDNs.
Not really, because the approach you’ll take depends on the use case. Performance is what matters, so the decision has to be made for performance:
- If you have 500 pages and rebuilding everything takes seconds, you are probably going to use SSG.
- If you have 500 pages, and rebuilding everything takes seconds, but you have to update almost every minute, you will consider SSR with a good HTTP Cache mechanism.
- If you have millions of pages and rebuilding everything takes hours, SSR and a good event-driven HTTP Cache will be the way to go.
- If you have thousands of highly dynamic pages, SSR might be the way.
Pretty straightforward, right? Well, then the questions and the ideas start to pop:
- Maybe you don’t have to rebuild everything all the time. If so, isn't an Incremental Static Regeneration (ISR) approach a better option when using NextJS? Or how about Reactive Site Generator (RSG) with Gatsby?
- Maybe you can combine SSG, SSR, and HTTP Cache?
- Maybe you can split and decouple even more your web application to take full advantage of those concepts?
eCommerce is different in a way that in eCommerce, almost everything is dynamic:
- Catalog (Prices, B2C and B2B)
- Product Variants and Stock/Inventory
- Sales, Promotions, Discount, etc.
- Checkout Process, Cart, etc.
- Order Management, Fulfillment pipelines, etc.
Every time an Order is made, a product variant might become unavailable, which excludes full SSG from the choice. Then again, maybe you sell digital products, so that might not be an issue.
But for a fully featured professional eCommerce, SSG only is impossible. Fully dynamic would not be scalable, so that’s not an option either.
The answer is in the middle, making frameworks like Remix Run interesting because they combine the two worlds by mixing SSR and SSG and allowing HTTP Cache almost out of the box.
I am a huge fan of HTTP Caching using the expiration model to reach more than 98% hit/ratio while having fresh pages/components all the time.
Every eCommerce application is different, therefore we always have to design it on the key principles of what makes your company unique. Having said that, numerous legitimate approaches exist to developing a performant web application. With this post, I really hope I provided you with enough food for thought to help you come up with the best solution for your company.
Thinking of switching to an eCommerce platform + frontend framework that helps rather than hinders your website's performance but not sure of the approach you should take?
Don’t worry, we got your back!
You Should Also Read👇
Server-Side Rendering. Client-Side Rendering. CSR with Prerendering, etc. The differences, trade-offs, and similarities between most common web rendering solutions and why you should care about them as a dev.
The frontend frameworks ecosystem is booming so much that finding the right one for your online business/store has become challenging (at best). We’d love to help. This post is all about that.